The below is an article by Farish A. Noor. I have asked my church elders to provide me (the inquisitive, curious, ignorant, new Catholic convert) something which can explain why The Herald has issues with our Malaysian Government over the use of the term ‘Allah’. The below is one of the recommended reading article. Beside this, I am now reflecting on the Word of God from the AlKitab (the Bahasa Melayu Bible) to find out how the word ‘Allah’ is used. Bahasa Malaysia was my main language because I studied all my school subjects in Bahasa Malaysia from Std. One to Form Five. Therefore, I personally find the Bible much easier to understand when I read it in Bahasa Melayu than reading it in English.

I also need to repeat this again and again that the word Allah has been used in the year 1700 to 1800 in the High Malay Bible (the Bahasa Malaysia during that century) when the Christian missionaries were in our land. As someone who is involved in the cyberworld, I have seen enough wrong accusations that we are now ‘grabbing’ the name for the sake of it. It is not. It has been around for centuries.

So, I hope the article by Farish Noor which I am copying in whole will be enlightening.

Dec 28, 2007
RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS IN MALAYSIA
The origins of the word ‘Allah’
By Farish A. Noor
CAIRO - I’M WRITING this in the company of my Egyptian friends who are Muslims, Catholics and Copts.

Eid al-Adha has come and gone, and I’ve been to several events which saw Muslims and Copts celebrating together, visiting each others’ homes and feasting on copious amounts of food.

Now in the midst of Christmas, Muslims, Catholics and Copts are once again heading for the communal table and there will be much licking of chops, breaking of bread and merry making for everyone.

It is all simply too pleasant to believe, yet it is real and this is what life is like for many in Cairo, the ‘Mother of civilisation’ and home to more than 20 million Egyptians from all walks of life.

What is most striking to an outside observer like myself - though rather banal for the Egyptians - is the fact that in all these celebrations, the same word ‘Allah’ is used to denote that supreme and singular divinity, God.

Catholics and Copts alike exclaim Masha-allah, Wallahi, ya-Rabbi, Wallah-u allam, and of course Allahuakbar day in, day out, everywhere they go. The Coptic taxi driver blares out ‘By Allah, can’t you see where you are parking?’ as he dodges the obstacle ahead.

The Catholic shopkeeper bemoans: ‘Ya Allah, ya Allah! You can only offer me two pounds for the scarf? Wallahi, my mother would die if she heard that! Ya-Rabbi, ya-Rabbi!’

Yet Malaysia is now embroiled in another non-issue: the Malaysian Catholic Herald, a publication by and for Catholics in the country, has been told that it can no longer publish its Malay-language edition if it continues to use the word ‘Allah’ for God. Worse still, the country’s Deputy Internal Security Minister Johari Baharum recently stated that ‘only Muslims can use the word Allah’, ostensibly on the grounds that it is a Muslim word.

The mind boggles at the confounding logic of such a non-argument, which speaks volumes about the individual’s ignorance of Muslim culture, history and the fundamental tenets of Islam itself.

For a start, the word ‘Allah’ predates the revelation to the Prophet Muhammad and goes back to the pre-Islamic era. Christians had been using the word long before there were any Muslims. It is an Arabic word and thus common to all the peoples, cultures and societies where Arabic, in all its dialects, is spoken. It is also understood by millions of Arabic speakers to mean God, and little else.

One could add that as it is an Arabic word, it therefore has more to do with the development and evolution of Arabic language and culture and less to do with Islam.

It is hard to understand how any religion can have a language to call its own, for languages emerge from a societal context and not a belief system. If one were to abide by the skewered logic of the Malaysian minister, then presumably the language of Christianity (if it had one) would be Aramaic, or perhaps Latin.

The minister’s remark not only shows his shallow understanding of Muslim culture and the clear distinction between Arab culture and Muslim theology, but also demonstrates his own lack of understanding of the history of the Malays, who, like many non- Arabs, only converted to Islam from the 13th century on.

Among the earliest pieces of evidence to indicate Islam’s arrival to the Malay archipelago are the stone inscriptions found in Malay states like Pahang where the idea of God is described in the sanskrit words Dewata Mulia Raya.

As no Malay spoke or even understood Arabic then, it was natural for the earliest Malay-Muslims to continue using the Sanskrit-inspired language they spoke.

Surely this does not mean they were lesser Muslims?

The ensuing ruckus over the ban facing the Christian Herald in Malaysia forces observers to ask the simple question: Why has this issue erupted all of a sudden, when the word ‘Allah’ has been used for so long with nary a protest in sight?

Coming at a time when the Malaysian government is already getting flak from the protests by Malaysian Hindus who insist that they remain at the bottom of the economic ladder after 50 years of independence, it would appear as if the administration cannot get enough bad publicity.

The administration of Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi came to power on the promise that it would promote its own brand of moderate Islam - one that was pluralist and respectful of other cultures and religions.

But time and again, the Malaysian public - first Hindus and now Christians - have felt necessary to protest over what they regard as unfair, biased treatment and the furthering of an exclusive brand of Islam that is communitarian and divisive.

This latest fiasco over the name of God would suggest that Prime Minister Badawi’s grand vision of a moderate Islam has hit the rocks, and is now floundering.

Just how the government is to regain its course is open to question, but what is clear is that some leaders should get their knowledge of their own religion in order first.

The writer is a Malaysian political scientist and historian based at the Zentrum Moderner Orient, Berlin; and one of the founders of the www.othermalaysia.org research site, where this article first appeared.

You may also want to read this blog post ‘Apabila orang Kristian pun menggunakan nama Allah‘ by U-start.

Tags: , ,

Related Post

9 Responses to “The origins of the word ‘Allah’ (by Farish Noor)”

  1. who is farish noor that u believe every word he said.?,
    Allah is Almighty God who has no sons as he is the Creator. How can you equate tim to your god who you believe has a son in Jesus, a mortal being?

  2. masrul - It is not Farish Noor who said Jesus is the Son of God. Farish merely shared the historical origin of the word Allah and how in the Middle East, Catholics and Muslims shared the same term for the Divine Being. And yes, what I believe in, i.e. Jesus is the Son of God is something that no one can change my mind.

  3. Malaysia is a democratic country, each of us has our right to choose what we wanna be and who we wanna be. Same goes as religion, this is our christian’s right to pray and use what ever name we wanna call our God. For those who are non- Christians, if you really have faith in your God and religion, surely you won’t easily sell it and buy a new faith because someone ask to. That won’t happen for those who are true to their God. So why disagreeing when christians using Allah as their God???? What ever the answers given, we christians will not bother about it because we have faith and we will continue using the word “Allah”.
    As for lilian, thanks for giving the info which explain the usage of “Allah” word among the christians.

  4. Can somebody enlighten me here….I have read somewhere that the origin of the word “Allah”is a actually a reference to the moon god/goddess which have been used by the Arabs during pagan worshipping before the coming of Islam. Is there any truth in this because I would not want to call my god “Allah” if it is true.
    Personally, as a Catholic I am not comfortable to refer God as “Allah”. It is not even a God’s name. Why can we just use the word “Tuhan” which is the same meaning as “God” ?

  5. Lilian, I feel so at peace reading this. I pray that the Muslims of our country Malaysia would read the article by Farish A Noor to widen their knowledge as to the history of the use of the word Allah.

    Reminds me of the late Arafat who used to attend his wife’s church. That’s love. Doncha think?

  6. The word “allaa” in Sanskrit (and a number of other Indian languages) means mother and or Goddes Kali. Hindus use thousands of names for God each to denote a particular conception. This word has been in use in India long before the advent of Christianity or Islam, perhaps coming from a time in the very dawn of human history.

    Perhaps the Arabs learnt it from the Indians like the many other things that they did in the old days such as Mathematics, Medicine and Astronomy. One should remember that the world’s first universities were started in ancient India. And learning is a good thing. We do that even today, learning from people all over the world.

    It is fighting over the name of God as if it were a registered brand name for the purpose of conducting a self-owned business, that does not seem very respectful to God.

  7. sathia - Thank you for your comment. I am glad to learn about it from you, so much I didn’t know….

    jane - We can only pray…

    Amen - Sathia has one explanation.

  8. The Origin Words of Allah* Hardly I want to put it here, cause it’s very imflaming indeed to be read both by the Christian and Non Christian alike. However, as an individuall who was brought up in the Catholic Seminary during my Secondary School Days, till I just make a way to the normal life after my F5, to which I was given a chance to do so by my Seminary priest to further my studies in my current chosen field.

    I would like to say and request from our non Christian Brothers and Sisters, that we are sharing the true Lord God and it would be very interesting and happy indeed to be in that way, no doubt we are perceiving the approached in a different way, for the Christian he’s the Father to all Human Being and he send Jesus Christ, his son to world who died and was raised on the 3rd day after his death. For the non Christian, I just can’t explained it to you. Hopefully you can do it for us. But whatever the difference, the Basic is there for us to understand.

    The real fact is that Allah was name given to the Lord God of Abraham, Issac, Jacob, Ishmael and if I am not mistaken, it is for sure there is some mentioning about that 4 names of the Bible people. So don’t fight for over the name of the true Lord God -which we are comfortable with as Allah. Non of us will be a good winner and neither will be a bad loser if we need a Court to decide that name for each and every one of us. Why we have to? We hope we are not imitating the Babylon Culture here, perhap?.

    TQ - Alleluia-Puji Tuhan

  9. The origins of the word ‘Allah’ is a continious debate amongst Muslims and Chrisitian theologians. However if you look into the history of Islam and observe the pre-Islamic context in which it was formed, you get to deduct a reasonable conclusion.

    It is a historical fact that the kabbah in the time of the prophet (pbh) the Kabbah was filled with 300 deity’s. This was the case in the time of the prophet Muhammad who was part of the Quryash tribe. It is also a fact that Allah was a highly respected moon god in Islam (especially the Quraynish tribe) with three daughters: al-Lat, al-Uzza and Manat. The other deitys were later removed from the Kabbah. There is archealogy and historical documents which varify this and it is agreed on by many theologians. It is important to note that Islam was formed around countries that were strongly monotheistic and Muhammad himself was often in contact with Christians and Jews. The other interpretation is that it is derived from the Hebrew word ‘Elochim’ and that the routes are found in biblical refrences (Old testament).

    I am not making any statements that are unbalanced or historically inaccurate. As i say there is no real unanimous agreement on the origins of the word Allah. Thus we are ultimatly left to speculation.

Leave a Reply